I really dislike Rolling Stone. I am not even sure why I get it anymore, but I do. I care so little about it that I actually never even changed the address to my current address when I moved to my own apartment here. So, everytime I see my parents, they hand me this big pile of non-important mail and the latest Rolling Stone is always there.
I am not sure where they jumped the shark, but the articles are rarely about anything good and the music they support is either not good at all, or extremely 5 minutes ago.
But, this month's issue appeared and a story caught my eye. Above the picture of half-naked Red Hot Chili Peppers: "Did Bush Steal the 2004 Election? How 350,000 Votes Disappeared in Ohio by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr."
Now, we are talking.
The article is amazing. RFK Jr. did an incredible amount of research and interviewed countless of people involved in the 2004 elections only to really come to the conclusion that the only conceivable way Bush won the 2004 election was due to election fraud.
There are many points to this article and I dont want to get into all of them, but the one I found most interesting is the strength and accuracy of exit polling. The following paragraphs are taken from the article. I strongly urge you to read the entire thing here and then go find a small hole to cry in:
Over the past decades, exit polling has evolved into an exact science.
Indeed, among pollsters and statisticians, such surveys are thought to
be the most reliable. Unlike pre-election polls, in which voters are
asked to predict their own behavior at some point in the future, exit
polls ask voters leaving the voting booth to report an action they just
executed. The results are exquisitely accurate: Exit polls in Germany,
for example, have never missed the mark by more than three-tenths of
one percent.
On the evening of the vote, reporters at each of the major networks
were briefed by pollsters at 7:54 p.m. Kerry, they were informed, had
an insurmountable lead and would win by a rout: at least 309 electoral
votes to Bush's 174, with fifty-five too close to call. In London,
Prime Minister Tony Blair went to bed contemplating his relationship
with President-elect Kerry.
As the last polling stations closed on the West Coast, exit polls
showed Kerry ahead in ten of eleven battleground states -- including
commanding leads in Ohio and Florida -- and winning by a million and a
half votes nationally. The exit polls even showed Kerry breathing down
Bush's neck in supposed GOP strongholds Virginia and North
Carolina. Against these numbers, the statistical likelihood of Bush
winning was less than one in 450,000. ''Either the exit polls, by
and large, are completely wrong,'' a Fox News analyst declared, ''or
George Bush loses.''
But as the evening progressed, official tallies began to show
implausible disparities -- as much as 9.5 percent -- with the exit
polls. In ten of the eleven battleground states, the tallied margins
departed from what the polls had predicted. In every case, the shift
favored Bush. Based on exit polls, CNN had predicted Kerry defeating
Bush in Ohio by a margin of 4.2 percentage points. Instead, election
results showed Bush winning the state by 2.5 percent. Bush also tallied
6.5 percent more than the polls had predicted in Pennsylvania, and 4.9
percent more in Florida.
AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Recent Comments